Headlines Speaking
Debate/Åä·Ð Essay/¿µÀÛ
Àΰ­°úÁ¤ Misc
ÀÚ·á½Ç
WTS ½ÃÇ躸±â
[Àΰ­°úÁ¤] ¡Ú¡Ù L(Opinions)-004 ¡Ú¡Ù
ÃÖ°í°ü¸®ÀÚ  |  16-03-20 17:41

 
ÁÖ¾îÁø ÁÖÁ¦¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÀÇ°ßÀ» »ìÆ캽À¸·Î½á ´Ü¼øÈ÷ "Yes/No"°¡ ¾Æ´Ñ
´Ù¸¥ °üÁ¡ÀÇ °¢µµ¿¡¼­ ºñ·ÔµÇ´Â ÀÇ°ßÀÇ Àü°³¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇØ º¸¸ç Åä·Ð ½Ç·ÂÀ» Çâ»óÇÑ´Ù.

Are We Ready for Driverless Cars? (Àü¹® Ŭ¸¯)
In announcing the company¡¯s hopes to have fully autonomous cars on American roads by 2020, Google¡¯s director of their self-driving car program said he did not think regulators would block the new technology. But even if they don¡¯t, will driverless cars feel safe enough to deploy? Will we be ready to share the roads with them by 2020, or will the perceived risks be too high?
* autonomous = ÀÚÀ²(ÀÚÁÖ)ÀûÀÎ/ self-driving = ½º½º·Î ¿îÁ¤ÇÏ´Â/ deploy = ¹èÄ¡ÇÏ´Ù; È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëÇÏ´Ù/ perceived = ÀÎÁö(ÀνÄ)µÈ

 2020³â±îÁö ¿îÀüÀÚ°¡ ¾ø´Â ÀÚµ¿Â÷°¡ ±æ¿¡ ¹èÄ¡µÇµµ µÉ±î¿ä? ÀÎÁöµÈ À§ÇèÀÌ ³Ê¹« ³ôÀº°¡¿ä?

1. Automation Has Already Saved Lives
ÀüÀÚ½Ä ¾ÈÁ¤¼º Á¦¾î¿À ÀüÀÚ Á¦¾î½Ä Á¦µ¿ ÀåÄ¡¿Í °°Àº ±â¼úµéÀº ¼ö³â°£ ÀÖ¾î¿Ô°í µµ·Î ¿©ÇàÀ» ÈξÀ
´õ ¾ÈÀüÇÏ°Ô ¸¸µå´Âµ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù.
Technologies such as electronic stability control and anti-lock brakes have been around for years, and
have helped make road travel much safer.

2. A New Regulatory Agency Is Needed First
ÀÌ ¹®Á¦´Â ¿¹¸¦ µé¾î¼­ µå·Ð(¹«ÀÎ ºñÇà±â) ¶Ç´Â ½ÉÁö¾î ½º¸¶Æ® ¶óµð¿À±îÁö ÇØ´çÀÌ µÈ´Ù.
This problem extends beyond just autonomous cars to drones, for example, or even "smart" radios.

3. The Cars Must Be Safe, Not Perfect
ÀÚÀ² ÁÖÇàÂ÷ÀÇ ¿Ïº®À» ±â´Ù¸®´Â °ÍÀº ¿îÀڵ鿡 ÀÇÇØ Á¦±âµÈ À§ÇèÀÇ ºÒÇÊ¿äÇÑ ¿µ±¸È­¸¦ ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù.
Waiting for autonomous vehicles to be perfect would mean the needless perpetuation of the risks posed by human drivers.

4. Ethical, and Efficiency, Tradeoffs
¿îÀüÀÚµéÀÌ °ú¼ÓÀ» Áñ±â´Â °ÍÀ» °í·ÁÇÒ ¶§, Á¦ÇÑ ¼Óµµ ¹ý·ü[±ÔÁ¤]À» ¾ö°ÝÈ÷ µû¸£´Â ÀÚ°¡¿îÀü ±â¼ú¿¡
¿ì¸®°¡ ¸¸Á·À» ÇÒ±î¿ä?

Considering that human drivers like to speed, will we be satisfied with self-driving technology that rigidly follows
the letter of speed-limit laws?