Global Breaking News - Sunday, December 22, 2024

One Sick Dog, One Steep Bill

Veterinary medicine has made big leaps in recent years, which is great news for ailing dogs and cats — but raises some tough questions for humans. With the availability of treatments like bone-marrow transplants and heart stents, it is now easy to spend $10,000 to $25,000 on medical procedures for a pet.

Knowing that many humans die of preventable illnesses, or even considering that many dogs and cats are euthanized in overcrowded animal shelters, can a person justify spending that much money to prolong one animal's life? If so, is it ethical to have a pet if you cannot afford such treatments?

 동물의 수명을 연장시키기위해 많은 돈을 사용하는것을 정당화할 수 있나요? 그렇다면 그와 같은 비싼
치료를 감당할 수 없는 사람이 애완동물을 소유하는것은 도덕적으로 옳은가요?

* It Seems Frivolous, Until It's Your Dog
When our 6-year-old Labrador was dying, the vet said, “There's nothing we can do.” We weren't prepared to give up so easily.
 
* Consider the Animal, Not Just the Cost
The first question is: Will the procedure improve the quality of life for the pet, or prolong suffering?
 
* An Ethical Quandary, No Matter the Species
Even if a treatment option is promising, people must consider the cost and caregiving burdens.
 
* Your Pet, Your Money, Your Call
Spending $10,000 on chemotherapy for your golden retriever is no more unethical than spending it on a two-week vacation in Tuscany.
 
* Our Obligation to Pets Is Limited
When you acquire a pet, you sign up to care for it for the duration of its life — but not 'at any cost.'
 
* For a Beloved Pet, No Wrong Answer
There is no shame in euthanizing a pet, if it is done out of love. Nor is there shame in spending money to prolong a pet's life.